单卡释疑

• (2015-08-25 official)

  如果有数个灭军恶体进行攻击，则对每个能够阻挡它们的生物而言，其操控者选择该生物要阻挡哪个灭军恶体。在这种情况下，能够阻挡数个生物之阻挡者必须尽量多阻挡这些进行攻击的灭军恶体。

  If more than one Breaker of Armies is attacking, the controller of each creature that could block them chooses which one that creature blocks. In this case, creatures that can block multiple creatures must block as many attacking Breaker of Armies as possible.

• (2015-08-25 gpt)

  如果在防御牌手的宣告阻挡者步骤中，由其操控的生物处于以下状况：该生物已横置；或该生物正受某咒语或异能之影响而不能阻挡，则它便不能阻挡。如果要支付费用才能让该生物阻挡，则这并不会强迫其操控者必须支付该费用。如果其操控者不支付该费用，则该生物不至于必须要阻挡。

  If, during its controller’s declare blockers step, a creature the defending player controls is tapped or is affected by a spell or ability that says it can’t block, then it doesn’t block. If there’s a cost associated with having it block, its controller isn’t forced to pay that cost. If they don’t, the creature doesn’t have to block.

• (2015-08-25 official)

  如果某个生物不能合法地阻挡灭军恶体，但是能够阻挡其他攻击生物，则它可以如此作。类似地，如果对于由防御牌手操控的某个生物而言，存在除非其操控者支付费用，否则它便不能阻挡灭军恶体的情况，则其操控者可以不支付费用，并用其阻挡其他攻击生物。

  If a creature can’t legally block Breaker of Armies but could block another attacking creature, it may do so. Likewise, if a creature the defending player controls can’t block Breaker of Armies unless its controller pays a cost, its controller may decline to pay that cost and block a different attacking creature.