单卡释疑

• (2008-04-01 gpt)

  呼魂异能是否会在生物进战场时触发，取决于该咒语的操控者是否选择支付呼魂费用，而非其是否实际支付（举例来说，如果该费用因其他异能之故被减少或改变）。

  Whether evoke's sacrifice ability triggers when the creature enters depends on whether the spell's controller chose to pay the evoke cost, not whether they actually paid it (if it was reduced or otherwise altered by another ability, for example).

• (2008-04-01 gpt)

  当你支付某咒语的呼魂费用来施放它时，该咒语的法术力费用并不会改变。你只是支付呼魂费用而已。

  When you cast a spell by paying its evoke cost, its mana cost doesn't change. You just pay the evoke cost instead.

• (2008-04-01 gpt)

  如果你以「不支付其法术力费用」的方式来施放咒语，则你不能利用其呼魂异能。

  If you're casting a spell "without paying its mana cost," you can't use its evoke ability.

• (2008-04-01 gpt)

  呼魂不会改变你能够施放具有此异能之生物的时机。如果你只能在能够施放法术的时机下施放该生物咒语，则利用呼魂施放它时也是如此。

  Evoke doesn't change the timing of when you can cast the creature that has it. If you could cast that creature spell only when you could cast a sorcery, the same is true for cast it with evoke.

• (2008-04-01 gpt)

  如果某生物咒语在施放后、进战场前改变了操控者，则该生物进战场时仍会被牺牲。类似地，如果某生物在施放后、进战场前改变了操控者，但在其牺牲异能结算前改变了操控者，则该生物仍会被牺牲。在这两种情况下，生物离开战场时的操控者将操控其离开战场异能。

  If a creature spell cast with evoke changes controllers before it enters, it will still be sacrificed when it enters. Similarly, if a creature cast with evoke changes controllers after it enters but before its sacrifice ability resolves, it will still be sacrificed. In both cases, the controller of the creature at the time it left the battlefield will control its leaves-the-battlefield ability.

• (2008-04-01 gpt)

  会令你在施放咒语时支付更多或更少费用的效应，也会令你在支付咒语的呼魂费用时支付更多或更少费用。这是因为这类效应影响的是咒语的总费用，而非其法术力费用。

  Effects that cause you to pay more or less to cast a spell will cause you to pay that much more or less while casting it for its evoke cost, too. That's because they affect the total cost of the spell, not its mana cost.